This recent combat has probably thrown up more questions than I have fielded in the last 10 years.
So when I do a T-Stop. Is the rule about adding to the roll on the crash table based on speed a hold over from before we added to that roll for the difficulty of the manoeuvre? It seems a double whammy. The Hazard is 1 per 10 mph of original speed which gets added to the crash result plus an extra 1 per 20 mph?
When we fishtail and roll on crash table 1 do we apply all the modifiers that we did to the original roll? It seems harsh as anything that could generate a roll of crash table 1 from crash table 2 is probably a result of a pretty heft hazard and the result from Crash table 1 would pretty much make the fishtail part redundant. I have been playing it that the roll on crash table 1 is a straight 2d6 roll.
I have been assuming that if you are dropping mines on automatic and you fishtail at the beginning of the next phase over those mines (as you fishtail before movement) then you hit them and they detonate if you roll 1-4.
If you end up with a serial crash result (i.e. moderate skid is followed by minor skid) in the next moment phase) and these cause further hazards (i.e. you hit debris) which result in crash results then you only take the worst of those results. For example: doing 50 mph I have to roll on crash table 1 in phase 1. I roll moderate skid. This is a skid in phase 2 and a minor skid in phase 3. I phase 2 my skid takes me over mines which detonate and I fail a control roll. This time I get fishtail and roll on CT1 which comes up moderate skid. In phase 3 I presume that I fishtail first and then only do the moderate skid as it was a worst result than the minor skid I would have otherwise performed (rather than do the minor skid and then a moderate skid or a minor skid and ignore the moderate skid). I now also have the additional minor skid in phase 4 that falls out from the moderate skid in phase 3.
So when I do a T-Stop. Is the rule about adding to the roll on the crash table based on speed a hold over from before we added to that roll for the difficulty of the manoeuvre? It seems a double whammy. The Hazard is 1 per 10 mph of original speed which gets added to the crash result plus an extra 1 per 20 mph?
When we fishtail and roll on crash table 1 do we apply all the modifiers that we did to the original roll? It seems harsh as anything that could generate a roll of crash table 1 from crash table 2 is probably a result of a pretty heft hazard and the result from Crash table 1 would pretty much make the fishtail part redundant. I have been playing it that the roll on crash table 1 is a straight 2d6 roll.
I have been assuming that if you are dropping mines on automatic and you fishtail at the beginning of the next phase over those mines (as you fishtail before movement) then you hit them and they detonate if you roll 1-4.
If you end up with a serial crash result (i.e. moderate skid is followed by minor skid) in the next moment phase) and these cause further hazards (i.e. you hit debris) which result in crash results then you only take the worst of those results. For example: doing 50 mph I have to roll on crash table 1 in phase 1. I roll moderate skid. This is a skid in phase 2 and a minor skid in phase 3. I phase 2 my skid takes me over mines which detonate and I fail a control roll. This time I get fishtail and roll on CT1 which comes up moderate skid. In phase 3 I presume that I fishtail first and then only do the moderate skid as it was a worst result than the minor skid I would have otherwise performed (rather than do the minor skid and then a moderate skid or a minor skid and ignore the moderate skid). I now also have the additional minor skid in phase 4 that falls out from the moderate skid in phase 3.
More clarifications
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire