#1. ST 16: swing dmg 2d+2; 4-14 dmg, average 9. ST 17: swing dmg 3d-1; 2-17 dmg, average 9,5. BUT with weapon which has swing-x dmg, for example Small Knife with swing-3. This is ST 16: 2d-1 (1-11, average 6) and ST 17: 3d-4 (-1-14, average 6,5). And most importantly, with ST 16, even on natural 1 on both d6's character deal 1 dmg. WIth ST 17, there are 4 possible rolls when character deal 0 dmg... Very similar situation is for example with ST 18 (thr 1d+2) and 19 (thr 2d-1), and punch (thr-1).
#2. Dmg for 2handed weapons. With big ST, for example 17 (swing 3d-1), and for example bastard sword (wielded 2h is sw+2; wielded 1h is sw+1), it's merely 1 dmg of difference. Should be like this? Only marginal difference between 2 handed chop and 1 handed chop, with as much strength?
#2. Dmg for 2handed weapons. With big ST, for example 17 (swing 3d-1), and for example bastard sword (wielded 2h is sw+2; wielded 1h is sw+1), it's merely 1 dmg of difference. Should be like this? Only marginal difference between 2 handed chop and 1 handed chop, with as much strength?
Few questions about damage
